Wild Card Games Who Knows Where? - The Global Location Guessing Family Board Game

Product Information

The person, let's call him Carl, is lonely and thinking of his two best friends, but their separation from him are independent events. Abby has just departed from Carl - which is how Carl comes to be sitting there feeling sorry for himself. Bill left a long time earlier, but regular messages had kept Carl informed about where Bill was, however, the most recent message said that Bill was travelling further north and that Carl might not hear from him for a long time. They come together into a single sentence/thought, not because the events are related, but because they are his best friends and he misses them both. The song is slow-paced, with Sandy observing events, and likening them to timeless natural things. The song is in E major with unusual jazz style chord progressions Perhaps even dropping the "now" would help, it's probably unnecessary (and perhaps the cause of the confusion).

Who Knows Where Game – The Ultimate Global Location Guessing Game Who Knows Where Game – The Ultimate Global Location Guessing Game

Thanks for your thoughts, Dr. Drib. Like dialogue, characters thoughts are not always as clearly stated as they could be, but your interpretation of my original sentence does have me concerned about how unclear it must be. You appear to be making a connection between the two clauses that was not intended. and later used the title as the name of her album Who Knows Where the Time Goes, released in 1968. Also in 1968 Sandy joined Fairport Convention. American singer Judy Collins heard the original demo recording of 1967 and recorded a cover version of the song. She released it on the B-side of her single, "Both Sides, Now", A Prairie Home Companion for December 31, 2011". American Public Media. 2012 . Retrieved 27 January 2012. might be clearer then the "and" building the connection between the clauses there. I think many readers will see as joining the thoughts more then you intend them too.Eva Cassidy's version was featured in the Season 1 Episode 10 of the Netflix drama Firefly Lane. [8] While the sentence is awkward, I am not convinced it requires any punctuation excepting the period at the end. And sure enough, tomorrow has arrived and now I'm thinking that hyphens tend to call out the sentence, bringing it to greater attention than it deserves. Without the hyphens there is a good chance that most readers will pass on by, understand the sense intended (in this context) and move on without distraction. Apk, "now" was intended to be against the second clause, as in: until recently he did know where Bill was, but now he doesn't. Sandy originally recorded the song as a demo in 1967, simply singing and playing guitar. Later in 1967 she joined The Strawbs and re-recorded the song,

Who Knows Where the Time Goes Fairport Convention - Chordie Who Knows Where the Time Goes Fairport Convention - Chordie

Sandy Denny: Who Knows Where the Time Goes?". Mainly Norfolk: English Folk and Other Good Music. Reinhard Zierke . Retrieved 2 June 2017. I realised after I posted that my original sentence used "knew" rather than "knows" (I think I confused myself by trying to be clever in the subject). I like the "who-knows-where" and would not reword it if that's the words the author wants, but I do think adding a comma before "now" at the end would make it look too busy.

A question mark seems necessary here.) If you tried to use "knows" in this version it would be obviously wrong: "Abby was gone, and who knows where Bill was now?" It would have to become "Abby is gone, and who knows where Bill is now?" - and it wouldn't fit the context very well (self pity is mostly past tense, it seems to me). I did consider completely splitting in the clauses, but it doesn't read as smoothly in the paragraph that this comes from. The emotional connection is intended - he's missing his friends. I think that in the larger context the meaning is clearer. (The reader has just come from Abby's departure, and knows what is happening to Bill from a previous scene.) I think I can see the real benefit in the hyphens. Without them that second clause in the second sentence could (at a stretch) be interpreted as: Bill was the one that knew where Abby had gone. The hyphens make the intention more obvious, I think. (I may think differently when I look at it again tomorrow. )